Beyond the 806
Federal judge strikes down Texas law restricting drag performances

A federal judge struck down Texas's 2023 law restricting drag performances, ruling it unconstitutional after a legal fight that had already let the ban take effect once. The law had been challenged in court before, but an appeals court set aside the judge's earlier decision, allowing the restrictions to kick in this past March while the lawsuit kept moving forward.
The law had been challenged in court before, but an appeals court set aside the judge's earlier decision, allowing the restrictions to kick in this past March while the lawsuit kept moving forward. That meant performers across the state operated under the law for months before this latest ruling landed.
Brigitte Bandit, an Austin-based drag performer and plaintiff in the case, called the decision a relief. "Drag has always been a form of free expression, and it is a relief that the court recognized that," Bandit said in a statement. She added that as a lifelong Texan she was "sick of this state trying to censor art and stoke hatred and violence against drag artists and the LGBTQIA+ community."
For performers and venues in Lubbock, the ruling removes at least the current legal threat. The city has its own complicated history with drag events, and shows here had been navigating the same statewide restrictions everyone else was.
The legal battle is not necessarily over. The state could appeal again, sending the case back through the same appellate process that already suspended this judge's ruling once before.
Common questions
What did the federal judge decide about Texas's drag performance law?
- The judge struck down Texas's 2023 drag performance law, ruling it unconstitutional. The law had already gone into effect once after an appeals court set aside an earlier ruling against it, meaning performers across Texas operated under the restrictions for several months before this latest decision.
Who was involved in the lawsuit against the Texas drag law?
- Brigitte Bandit, an Austin-based drag performer, was a plaintiff in the case. After the ruling, she called it a relief, saying drag is a form of free expression and that the court recognized that. She also said she was tired of the state trying to censor art.
Stay in the loop
Weekly Lubbock news, deals, and events. Free.
Read next
At state education board, Texans debate how Islam should be portrayed in high school history classes - Community Impact
JD Vance reacts to airstrike that killed four at Iran wedding: ‘Things happen’ - The Guardian
GOP candidate for Missouri House charged with conspiring to plant cocaine on opponent - CBS News
