West Texas
LubbockAmarilloSoonMidland / OdessaSoonBig SpringSoonAbileneSoon
News/Beyond the 806

Beyond the 806

Supreme Court clears way for Trump to keep building White House ballroom - BBC

Supreme Court clears way for Trump to keep building White House ballroom - BBC

The Supreme Court voted 5-4 Tuesday to let construction continue on a $400 million ballroom at the White House, overriding lower court rulings that had moved to stop the project. The court granted the Trump administration's emergency request to keep building the above-ground portion of the structure.

The court granted the Trump administration's emergency request to keep building the above-ground portion of the structure. The decision was not unanimous among conservatives. Chief Justice John Roberts broke with the majority and joined the three liberal justices in dissent, writing that the construction is "likely unlawful" because Congress has not approved the project.

The National Trust for Historic Preservation had filed the legal challenge that produced those lower court rulings. Those rulings would have halted work on the above-ground section, and the Supreme Court's emergency order blocks them.

For people watching national politics, the Roberts dissent is the detail worth sitting with. He is a conservative appointee, and his agreement with the liberal bloc, paired with his explicit language about the project lacking congressional approval, signals the legal fight is far from finished. A 5-4 emergency order keeps the shovels moving for now, but it does not settle the underlying constitutional question about whether the executive branch can spend on a project of this scale without a vote from Congress.

The $400 million price tag makes it one of the most expensive single structures ever proposed for the White House grounds.

Common questions

What did the Supreme Court decide about the White House ballroom?

The Supreme Court voted 5-4 to allow construction to continue on a $400 million White House ballroom. The court granted the Trump administration's emergency request, blocking lower court rulings that would have halted work on the above-ground portion of the structure.

Why did Chief Justice John Roberts side against the majority?

Roberts broke with fellow conservatives and joined the three liberal justices in dissent. He wrote that the construction is likely unlawful because Congress has not approved the project, making him the lone conservative voice against allowing work to continue.

Stay in the loop

Weekly Lubbock news, deals, and events. Free.

Read next